Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Reanimator | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Dinosaurs | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mardu Siegebreaker | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| sheffielddeckwins | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 | |
| Rakdos Reanimator | ermagoframiro | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , 5 Color Legends , Dimir Reanimator , Esper Reanimator , Golgari Reanimator , Gruul Dinosaurs , Gruul Surprise , Jund Reanimator , Jund Throne
Meta Performance Analysis
Etali, Primal Conqueror ranks #387 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 95%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 67.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Etali, Primal Conqueror is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 7 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.0%. Etali, Primal Conqueror has a win rate of 85.9%, making it 16.2% better than other 7-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 9 | 89.6% | 6 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 6 | 88.1% | 4 |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 5 | 85.7% | 3 |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 70.0% | 4 |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 15 | 67.1% | 6 |
| Overlord of the Boilerbilges | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 6 | 60.2% | 3 |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 17 | 57.4% | 9 |
| Vaultborn Tyrant | Creature — Dinosaur | 8 | 56.2% | 4 |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 17 | 54.9% | 5 |
| Harvester of Misery | Creature — Spirit | 17 | 52.5% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Etali, Primal Conqueror than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 7 | 83.7% | 78.1% | +5.6% |
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 7 | 83.7% | 79.4% | +4.3% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 83.7% | 79.8% | +3.9% |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 6 | 85.3% | 81.5% | +3.8% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 8 | 80.4% | 77.7% | +2.7% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 9 | 82.7% | 80.5% | +2.2% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 80.0% | 78.4% | +1.6% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 9 | 82.7% | 82.0% | +0.7% |
| Zombify | Sorcery | 4 | 10 | 84.5% | 85.2% | -0.7% |
| Valgavoth's Faithful | Creature — Human Cleric | 1 | 7 | 83.7% | 84.8% | -1.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rakdos Reanimator | 21 | 60.0% | 46.2% |
| Naya Legends | 9 | 100.0% | 35.6% |
| Unknown Archetype | 8 | 2.5% | 25.9% |
| Mardu Reanimator | 7 | 100.0% | 16.7% |
| Gruul Dinosaurs | 2 | 25.0% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.